Architects and Sustainable Design
Green Building Legislation in the United States
Green/High-Performance Building Legislation in the
States
The following map displays states (in green) with legislation
mandating the use of green/high-performance building standards for
new state-funded building projects and renovations.
Green = States that have
passed green/high-performance building legislation
White = States that have not passed green/high-performance building
legislation
Arkansas
On March 29, 2005, Arkansas House Bill 2445 was passed, followed by
passage in the Senate on April 6, 2005. The bill is titled, An Act
to Promote the Conservation of Energy and Natural Resources in the
Design of State Building Projects Through the Use of Sustainable
Building Rating Systems, and states
In recognition of the economic, energy conservation, and environmental benefits of sustainable building design, it is in the best interest of the State of Arkansas to initiate a process to encourage improved building practices, to provide support and information to assist state agencies in carrying out the purposes of this subchapter, and to continue development of best building practices through a legislative task force to evaluate and report to the General Assembly the progress being made under this subchapter.
State agencies conducting or funding a public building project or rehabilitation project are encouraged to refer to and should utilize whenever possible and appropriate the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design or Green Globes rating systems referred to in this subchapter.
The bill also establishes a Legislative Task Force on
Sustainable Building Design and Practices. To view the state's legislation, click
here.
Connecticut
On May 26, 2006, the state passed Public Act 06-187 which
requires the adoption of regulations to adopt building construction
standards that are consistent with or exceed the silver building
rating of LEED for new commercial construction and major renovation
projects. Prior to January 1, 2007, the Commissioner of Public
Works, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection, and the
Commissioner of Public Safety worked together to create these
regulations. To view the state's legislation, click
here.
Louisiana
Prior to the 2007 legislative session, the House Committee on
Commerce produced a report studying the feasibility of imposing
green building standards for certain public buildings. This study
is a result of House Bill No. 498 which proposed energy and
environmental building standards for certain buildings. To view the text of HR 498, click
here.
Maryland
On March 26, 2005, the Maryland House passed HB 196, followed by
the passage of SB 92 on April 4, 2005. This legislation requires
that state capital projects (state-funded building projects) meet
green/high-performance building standards. The bill states that a
high performance building means a building that
-
Achieves at least a silver rating according to the U.S. Green Building Councils LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) green building rating system
-
Achieves at least a two-globe rating according to the Green Building Initiatives Green Globes program
-
Achieves at least a comparable numeric rating according to a nationally recognized, accepted, and appropriate numeric sustainable development rating system, guideline, or standard
-
Meets nationally recognized, consensus-based, and accepted green building guidelines, standards, or systems approved by the state.
To view the state's legislation, click
here.
Nevada
On June 17, 2005, Nevada Governor Guinn signed into law AB3 which
states
Each occupied public building whose construction will be sponsored or financed by this State must, when completed, meet the requirements to be certified at or meet the equivalent of the base level or higher in accordance with the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Building Rating System, or an equivalent standard, as adopted by the Director of the Office of Energy pursuant to section 11 of this act.
During each biennium, at least two occupied public buildings whose construction will be sponsored or financed by this State must be designated as demonstration projects and must, when completed, meet the requirements to be certified at or meet the equivalent of the silver level or higher in accordance with the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Building Rating System, or an equivalent standard, as adopted by the Director of the Office of Energy pursuant to section 11 of this act.
To view the state's legislation, click
here.
Washington
On April 8, 2005, Washington Governor Christine Gregoire signed
into law ESSB 5509, requiring state-funded projects over 5,000
square feet, including school district buildings, to use
high-performance green building standards. The bill states that
The legislature finds that public buildings can be built and renovated using green/high-performance methods that save money, improve school performance, and make workers more productive. Green/high-performance public buildings are proven to increase student test scores, reduce worker absenteeism, and cut energy and utility costs.
Sec. 3 (1) All major facility projects of public agencies receiving any funding in a state capital budget must be designed, constructed, and certified to at least the LEED silver standard.
(2) All major facility projects of any entity other than a public agency or public school district receiving any funding in a state capital budget must be designed, constructed, and certified to at least the LEED silver standard.
(3)(a) Public agencies, under this section, shall monitor and document ongoing operating savings resulting from major facility projects designed, constructed, and certified as required under this section.
Sec. 4 (1) All major facility projects of public school districts receiving any funding in a state capital budget must be designed and constructed to at least the LEED silver standard or the Washington sustainable school design protocol.
(2) Public school districts under this section shall: (a) Monitor and document appropriate operating benefits and savings resulting from major facility projects designed and constructed as required under this section for a minimum of five years following local board acceptance of a project receiving state funding; and (b) report annually to the superintendent of public instruction.
To view the state's legislation, click here.





